Politicomaniac

Posts Tagged ‘tribalism’

Why I will not be leaving the Lib Dems any time soon

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

Lots of people keep calling me a Tory, some jokingly and some serious. This is getting out of hand (I take great offence to being equated with an arch enemy) and I want to explain why coalition government doesn’t make me (or any other Lib Dem) a Conservative douche-bag.

Let’s go over (one more time) the idea of coalition governments, and deal with why Labour can’t take what happened. When no party secures an outright majority, it is up to the party leaders to negotiate (as the Labour, Green and Nationalist parties agreed, in early May at least.) The priority in general is to create a stable-ish government, perhaps based on confidence and supply; a small number of manifesto concessions in exchange for budget votes. However, in a time of crisis (the War, for example) a coalition is formed, so that multiple parties have input into the running of the situation.

Whether or not you accept that the recession/deficit ”crisis” was such an emergency situation, the latter is preferable to the former because stable government means better value for taxpayers; the bond market is nicer to stable governments than it is to unstable ones. For a coalition to be stable, however, each side needs to know that it won something. The Labour party line is that Lib Dems won nothing, and are helping the Tories be Tories just for ministerial car perks. This is utter nonsense; Lib Dem MPs and Peers would not have voted for this coalition (no votes against, only abstentions) if they didn’t think we had made significant ground.

So why are Labour so insistant? I think the problem is that the Labour party always thought of the “Liberals”, especially after the merger with a Labour splinter group, as a subset of the Labour party. Rebellious, a bit posh, but ultimately socialists deep down, and would only ever side with Labour in a hung parliament. When we negotiated with the Tories, the things we won weren’t things that Labour value; greater personal freedoms and the repeal of state-terror laws, more efficient public services run by people on the ground rather than known-it-alls in Whitehall, a fairer voting system (Labour do the best out of the current status quo,) an elected House of Lords.

These are things that matter a great deal to people who value the fair distribution of power and influence, as well as the fair distribution of wealth, but mean nothing to the power hoarding nonsense-garbling New Labour behemoth. The Lib Dems are in this coalition because the things we won are important to us; just as important as social justice. Labour don’t believe us because they don’t agree.

I will oppose many of the things this Government will do, just as I have opposed some of the Lib Dem leadership’s actions and all the Tory nonsense-mongering in the past — however well Clegg does in taming the Cameron in the next few months or years he still won’t be able to herd this cat! — but, sorry Labour, I will be remaining a Lib Dem because constructive dissent, a good debate and a real argument are what my party is all about. I can quite happily pay my membership subs and deliver focus leaflets while disagreeing with some words or actions of some members; because my voice counts too. If I were to join the red team, I would be drowned in the all consuming ridiculousness that your local members have to put up with; I would no longer be allowed to speak at conference, I would be persecuted by local party officials, and I would be denied access to an affiliated trade union because I work on the wrong side of the arbitrary tribalist barriers erected for some parts of some companies, sometimes.

No thanks, I’m a Lib Dem.

The root of all evil

Sunday, June 20th, 2010

I would like to contest the now outdated idea that the greatest evil out there is money. I don’t deny that money can persuade people to do stupid things, but ultimately it is the people, and their ideas, that cause the evil, not the money (which is an emotionless mathematical abstraction designed to make economics work.)

So yes, I think that the greatest evil is an idea. It is one that pops up in all sorts of places and makes people argue for all sorts of nastiness.

Moral conservatism

In brief, moral conservatism says that people should be subject to my moral code, which should be enforced by law. People are divided into the good (deserving) and the bad (undeserving,) and society (and the state, if one exists,) need only take action to protect the interests of the good/deserving ones.

It is the principal employed by religious extremists to justify the killing of non believers. It is the principal used by the daily mail to justify harsh, unsympathetic treatment of asylum seekers and those on benefits. It is the principal that drives racial hatred. It is the principal the Pope uses to attack homosexuals. It is the principal used by Israel to perpetuate economic hardship on and attack the Palestinians, and the reason Palestinians kill Israeli civilians.

It is the principal used by the conservative party to justify attacking the public sector in times of debt, and the principal used by the labour party for building the public sector up in times of excess. It is the principal that makes Polly Toynbee write articles in which the UK in a fight between public sector heroes and private sector villains, and Jan Moir call all gay people promiscuous druggies who will all die young.

It is the most evil idea in the world, and the cause of all suffering: this arbitrary group of people are more important, and more deserving, than “others.”

Liberalism as the inverse

Moral conservatism is a principal which is in direct opposition to liberalism, which says that the law is there to protect everyone, and should be based on the principal of preventing harm, not arbitrary restriction.

It is the principal used when arguing for equal rights laws, protecting minorities (racial, cultural, sexual preference, religious, political) from the evils of majority rule. It is the principal that drives the seemingly endless search for world peace, and peaceful coexistence within states. It is the principal which justifies the state welfare, and which drove the Liberal Party to found it in the early 20th Century.

Next time: charity as the embodiment of moral conservatism (and why the state is the solution,) and when liberals take things too far.